Monday, June 1, 2026

The Ultimate Crisis: RCB Won Again


Royal Challengers Bengaluru have done it again.

Back-to-back.

I have supported this franchise since 2008. Not casually. Not as pleasant background entertainment. The kind of support that has physiological consequences. The kind where the eighteenth over of a close game is genuinely not good for you.

For nearly two decades, RCB losing was almost cosmological in its consistency. We did not merely fail — we innovated in failure. Other teams lost cricket matches. We produced original interpretations of entropy, taking commanding positions and dismantling them with a creativity that bordered, honestly, on genius. You could not manufacture that kind of chaos deliberately. It had to be sincere.

And it was. Completely, tragically sincere.

That sincerity was the point.

When we finally won last year ; seventeen years in - it did not feel like sport. It felt like a collective nervous breakdown resolving itself. Strangers embraced. Grown adults wept. For a few hours every RCB supporter was younger, lighter, briefly cured of something they hadn’t known was a wound.

That was the summit.

Tonight was different.

Kohli played like a man who had simply decided the result in advance and was now executing. Gujarat were restricted, chased down, dispatched. At one point I noticed that Romario Shepherd had been retained in the eleven!!! again by Andy Flower, through every selection meeting, against the sustained prayers of an entire fanbase. There he was. In the final. We won anyway, without requiring him to do anything consequential. In any previous season that observation would have triggered a minor cardiovascular event.

Tonight it felt like a line item in a project report.
The franchise that once specialised in emotional catastrophe has become a machine. A well-calibrated, professionally managed, genuinely frightening machine. 
And I find I miss the catastrophe.

This is the most structurally absurd complaint possible. 
And yet.

There is something about hope-without-evidence that is irreplaceable. Hope with evidence is just probability. Pleasant, but it doesn’t do what hope is supposed to do — which is make you feel, briefly and irrationally, that the universe is personally interested in your outcomes.

RCB used to make me feel that.

Now they make me feel like a well-informed stakeholder.
The first trophy is a miracle. The second is confirmation. The third is a KPI.

Somewhere in that progression gratitude becomes expectation, and expectation quietly kills the thing that made it worth wanting in the first place.
I will watch every game next season. I will still build elaborate causal theories about how a dropped catch in the powerplay has structural implications for events occurring six weeks later. Some things don’t change.

But a part of me mourns the old days. The impossible days. The days when an RCB victory felt less like a probable outcome and more like evidence that the universe occasionally makes exceptions.

That feeling, it turns out, was the actual product.
The trophies were just proof it happened.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Thursday, April 30, 2026

A Considered Decision


“I think I’m left-leaning,” said Lefty.


Righty didn’t respond immediately. He preferred to take a second—just enough to make his answers feel considered. He had been doing this for approximately four billion years.


“Interesting,” he said at last. “Because I’m fairly certain I’m right-leaning.”


“How do you know?”


Righty paused again.


“It’s just where I find myself,” he said. “Feels correct.”


Lefty absorbed that.


“Same,” he said. “But for left.”


“Of course.”


A brief, respectful silence followed. The kind shared between two independent thinkers who have arrived, separately and freely, at opposite conclusions about everything.


“I think it’s important,” said Lefty, “that we don’t become ideological.”


“Absolutely,” said Righty. “I’m very open-minded.”


“Same. I just happen to believe left is—objectively—better.”


“And I’m open to all views,” said Righty, “as long as they don’t require me to be wrong.”


“Fair.”


They both felt admirably balanced.


“Do you believe,” Lefty began, “that if we do good, good will be done unto us?”


Righty tilted into the question. He liked questions. They made him feel philosophical, which was different from actually being philosophical, but the sensation was similar.


“What is good?” he asked.


“Doing the right thing.”


“And what is the right thing?”


Lefty hesitated.


“Well—not doing the wrong thing.”


Righty nodded slowly.


“That’s quite complete,” he said.


“Thank you.”


“You’re welcome.”


Lefty said “Actually, it’s society that decides what is right or wrong.”


Righty nodded “Society  decides what’s good.”


They sat with that for a moment. It had the texture of wisdom.


“I sometimes think,” said Righty, “that most people don’t really decide anything. They just follow.”


“Sheep,” said Lefty.


“Exactly.”


“I’d hate to be that.”


“As would I. I think independently.”


“As do I.”


A warm pause settled between them—the particular warmth of two individuals who are completely different from everyone else, and happen to be completely different in identical ways.


“Hypothetically,” said Righty, “why don’t we swap?”


Lefty blinked, internally.


“Swap?”


“Yes. You go right. I go left.”


Lefty considered this very seriously.


“I could,” he said. “In principle.”


“As could I.”


They both sat with the possibility. It felt bold. Expansive. Almost irresponsible.


After a while, Lefty spoke.


“I just don’t feel right about going right.”


“Same,” said Righty. “Left doesn’t sit well with me.”


“Then perhaps,” said Lefty, “we’re already where we’re meant to be.”


“That seems likely,” said Righty.


They both felt quietly affirmed by the flexibility of their thinking.


“Look,” said Lefty after a moment, “I’ll be honest. I think I’m just—a down kind of person.”


Righty turned this over carefully.


“Down?”


“Yes. It feels natural. Authentic. I’m not going to perform boldness I don’t feel.”


“That’s very grounded of you.”


“Thank you. If I go down, it will be because it’s true to me. Because I chose it. Not because of—”


“Pressure.”


“Never because of pressure.”


They both nodded. Authenticity, they agreed, was rare.


“I see it differently,” said Righty.


“Oh?”


“I think it’s the bold who define things. By not going down.”


“Not down?” said Lefty. “What is not down?”


“That’s the point,” said Righty. “We don’t know. But it matters that we ask.”


“Otherwise we’re just—”


“Sheep.”


“Yes.”


“I believe,” Righty continued, “in remaining open. To new directions. New possibilities.”


“To what?” Lefty asked.


“To new directions. New possibilities.”


“Such as?”


“Well—not down.”


“Right.”


“Or sideways.”


Lefty considered this.


“Is sideways real?”


“It could be,” said Righty, “if we’re willing to think differently.”


Lefty liked that. It sounded like the kind of thing that happened to other people.


“Coming back to good,” said Lefty suddenly. “You said—what is good.”


“Yes.”


“I think we were wrong.”


“Oh?”


“I don’t think society decides what’s good.”


Righty leaned into this.


“Then what does?”


Lefty paused. This one mattered.


“I think we know,” he said. “Inherently.”


“Know?”


“Yes. It feels right. Or it doesn’t.”


Righty was quiet.


“So what feels right,” he said slowly, “is what is right?”


“Yes.”


“And what feels wrong—”


“Is wrong.”


They both sat with that. It felt deeper than before.


After a moment, Lefty said softly:


“It feels right to go down.”


Righty didn’t respond immediately.


Then:


“…Yes,” he said. “It does.”


“I just think,” said Lefty, “we shouldn’t rush these decisions.”


“Agreed,” said Righty. “Important choices require time.”


“Deliberation.”


“Depth.”


“Nuance.”


“At minimum.”


They both felt very thoughtful.


It was, they agreed silently, one of their best conversations.


They were, separately and freely, proud of themselves.


“Shall we decide?” said Righty.


“Yes,” said Lefty.


“On three?”


“On three.”


“One—”


“Two—”


A pause.


A good one.


The kind that makes a decision feel owned.


“—Three.”


They both chose.


At exactly the same time.


In exactly the same direction.


And then—


two rocks broke through the late afternoon stillness of a small garden.


A short, sharp drop.


A dull, unceremonious thud.


Lefty landed slightly to the left of Righty.


On each of them, in uneven white chalk—the way children write things, without irony, without knowing they’re writing anything important—were the words:


Lefty

Righty


On a bench nearby, two people turned at the sound.


“What was that?”


They looked over.


“Rocks? That’s odd.”


They walked closer.


One of them crouched down, brushing the dust away.


“Someone’s written on them. Lefty. Righty.”


They both instinctively glanced up, as if there might be a cliff above, imagining some children tossing them down to see if they would land exactly left and right.


The other smiled.


“Kids, probably.”


“Must be.”


They stood there a moment, considering this minor mystery, and then—as most mysteries do—it passed unremarkably into the afternoon.


They returned to the bench.


“I still think I lean left,” said the first.


The second took a second—just enough—before replying.


“Interesting,” they said. “Because I’m fairly certain I lean right.”


“How do you know?”


“It’s just where I find myself. Feels correct.”


“Same,” said the first. “But for left.”


“Of course.”


They continued.


Carefully.


Thoughtfully.


With full deliberation.


The ground, for the record, had been expecting all of them.